In terms of discouraging a rapid recovery, other government proposals created greater uncertainty and risk for businesses and investors. These include plans to increase greatly marginal tax rates for higher incomes. In addition, discussions at the Copenhagen conference and by the president to impose high taxes on carbon dioxide emissions must surely discourage investments in refineries, power plants, factories and other businesses that are big emitters of greenhouse gases.
Congressional "reforms" of the American health delivery system have gone through dozens of versions. The separate bills passed by the House and Senate worry small businesses, in particular. They fear their labor costs will increase because of mandates to spend much more on health insurance for their employees. The resulting reluctance of small businesses to invest, expand and hire harms households as well, because it slows the creation of new jobs and the growth of labor incomes.
....
By failing to adopt a measured approach to economic policy, Congress and the president may be slowing the economic recovery, and thereby prolonging the distress from the recession.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Why no recovery yet?
Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Gary Becker, Steven Davis, and Kevin Murphy ponder why the recovery has been so slow. They argue, though not using the term, that the Obama Administration has pursued bad supply-side policies.
Labels:
government failure,
incentives,
macroeconomics,
recession,
risk
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment